ARTICLES

Premier League reject lucrative Chelsea sponsorship proposal

Published by
Rajarshi Shukla

Premier League reject Chelsea FC’s request to sign Paramount Plus as their next sponsor

The Premier League have rejected Chelsea’s appeal to make streaming company Paramount Plus their next sponsor for the upcoming 2023/24 season.

As per the Daily Mail, (h/t Mirror) the Premier League have reason to reject Chelsea’s request to make Paramount Plus their sponsor as they believe it is in violation of competition rules.

Chelsea were in talks with an American subscription streaming giant but it has been a no-go. The English top flight rejected the proposal because it would disrupt the league’s broadcast sponsors.

CHelsea’s contract with Three has ended. (Photo by Catherine Ivill/Getty Images)

The Blues are also in talks with betting company Stake.com, despite the league’s ban on gambling sponsors. Clearly, we are not taking the easy way out when it comes to replacing Three.m

The league announced that the teams are not allowed to wear any betting sponsor on their jerseys starting in the 2026–27 season. They released a statement which read as:

“Premier League clubs have today collectively agreed to withdraw gambling sponsorship from the front of clubs’ matchday shirts, becoming the first sports league in the UK to take such a measure voluntarily in order to reduce gambling advertising.”

“The announcement follows an extensive consultation involving the League, its clubs, and the Department for Culture, Media, and Sport as part of the Government’s ongoing review of current gambling legislation.”

A new sponsor will be emblazoned on the Chelsea jerseys next season (Getty Images).

Just let’s hope Todd Boehly and the company don’t take any chances with the shirt sponsor since they might have significant repercussions and could put the club in hot water.

Now that our contract with our shirt sponsor Three has ended, we should have a sponsor who is willing to shell the cash to gain the fortune of being displayed on our jersey.

More Chelsea News

It is acceptable that the squad needs a lucrative sponsor, but we ought to look for a better, legal sponsor rather than having live-streaming or gambling organisations sponsor the team in the coming season.

Rajarshi Shukla

Recent Posts

“We have to see”- Chelsea boss Mauricio Pochettino gives his honest take with VAR in danger of PL removal

Chelsea boss Mauricio Pochettino talks about the future of VAR Mauricio Pochettino has entered the…

7 hours ago

Brighton boss takes sly dig at Chelsea’s spending and bashes referee after 2-1 PL loss

Brighton boss Roberto De Zerbi feels the referee made a poor decision in 2-1 defeat…

13 hours ago

Romano reveals Chelsea can sign 30G/A Pichichi favourite for a fee €40m

Fabrizio Romano feels Chelsea should consider making a move for Artem Dovbyk Transfer expert Fabrizio…

14 hours ago

“We’re not spending… we’re investing”- Todd Boehly on Chelsea’s much-maligned transfer approach that has crossed £1b mark

Chelsea owner Todd Boehly speaks on club's plans and giving players long-term contracts Todd Boehly…

15 hours ago

Mauricio Pochettino reveals one Chelsea player he is ‘disappointed’ in despite Chelsea getting past Brighton

Mauricio Pochettino says he was sad to see Chelsea star Reece James receive a red…

16 hours ago

Chelsea star should now look to emulate ‘idol’ Thiago Silva as summer exit beckons

Trevoh Chalobah comments on a post by Chelsea star Thiago Silva Thiago Silva will play…

17 hours ago